Federal Constitutional Court now must rule on the issue
The lower court of Hamburg issued a decision on 29 August 2017, concluding that Germany’s change-in-ownership rules, which result in a full forfeiture of tax losses (both carryforwards and current year losses) following a transfer of more than 50% of the shares in a German loss-making entity are incompatible with the constitution. The lower court then referred the case to the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) to rule on the issue.
Under the change-in-ownership rules, net operating loss carryforwards, interest carryforwards and current year losses are forfeited where there is a “harmful change in ownership.” A harmful change will exist where there is a direct or an indirect transfer of more than 25% (and up to 50%) of the shares in a company that has loss carryforwards results, leading to a pro rata forfeiture of the carryforwards; and a transfer of more than 50% of the shares results in a complete forfeiture of all available tax loss carryforwards. There are three exceptions to the loss forfeiture rules: the intragroup restructuring exception and the built-in-gains exception (both of which have applied since 2010), and the business continuation clause, which has applied since 2016.
On 29 March 2017, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the pro rata forfeiture of tax loss rules infringe the constitution and asked the German legislature to amend the change-in-ownership rules to bring them in line with the constitution, and make the change effective retroactively for the period 1 January 2008 - 31 December 2015. The legislative change should be finalized by 31 December 2018 (for further details, see GTLN dated 05/15/2017).
The BVerfG now will have to rule on the constitutionality of the rule that results in a full forfeiture of tax loss, and if the court issues a taxpayer-favorable decision, the German legislature may need to overhaul the change-in-ownership rules.
Affected taxpayers should monitor developments and keep relevant periods open (e.g. by filing an objection and applying for a suspension of proceedings by referring to the case before the BVerfG).
|www.deloitte-tax-news.de||Diese Mandanteninformation enthält ausschließlich allgemeine Informationen, die nicht geeignet sind, den besonderen Umständen eines Einzelfalles gerecht zu werden. Sie hat nicht den Sinn, Grundlage für wirtschaftliche oder sonstige Entscheidungen jedweder Art zu sein. Sie stellt keine Beratung, Auskunft oder ein rechtsverbindliches Angebot dar und ist auch nicht geeignet, eine persönliche Beratung zu ersetzen. Sollte jemand Entscheidungen jedweder Art auf Inhalte dieser Mandanteninformation oder Teile davon stützen, handelt dieser ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko. Deloitte GmbH übernimmt keinerlei Garantie oder Gewährleistung noch haftet sie in irgendeiner anderen Weise für den Inhalt dieser Mandanteninformation. Aus diesem Grunde empfehlen wir stets, eine persönliche Beratung einzuholen.
This client information exclusively contains general information not suitable for addressing the particular circumstances of any individual case. Its purpose is not to be used as a basis for commercial decisions or decisions of any other kind. This client information does neither constitute any advice nor any legally binding information or offer and shall not be deemed suitable for substituting personal advice under any circumstances. Should you base decisions of any kind on the contents of this client information or extracts therefrom, you act solely at your own risk. Deloitte GmbH will not assume any guarantee nor warranty and will not be liable in any other form for the content of this client information. Therefore, we always recommend to obtain personal advice.